The ECB announced another 239B in loan losses over the next 18-months for the EC. Futures dropped on news. What does this mean for us. If the recent trend holds where the entire market is under pressure, it's time to re-load on a few names. Our top buys are AAPL and C for now. I will continue to be a buyer of the 260/270 LEAPS whenever APPLE pulls back to below 250. C 5 LEAPS are the long trade for now...
C still isn't looked at heavily by the institutional investor, and even Cramer says you need to be in before they are. Anyhing under 4 makes the 4/5 Calls attractive...
Looking at Vodaphone VOD as a long trade as well, will be selling puts if I decide to pick the equity up. American Eagle is now breaking above 13 the 12.50 Augusts are making money.
Looking at RIG, lot's of negative pressure on the drilling world so it looks pretty well valued currently. Also, Natural Gas is gaining lot's of "big trader" attention as a long play as well.
Out of town for the week....
Happy trading...
Monday, May 31, 2010
Sunday, May 30, 2010
Thursday, May 27, 2010
16 Limit on AAPL Calls
I have lowered my limit to 16 from AAPL. My plan is to get out and then pick up the 12 LEAPS as the IPAD goes on sale internationally tomorrwo and APPLE is ramping up production to meet demand. This along with the Company is no valued greater than Microsoft and has no where to go but up as they are gaining ground everyday. When the IPhone moves to Verizon bottom line numbers should rise significantly.
Targets prices range from 300-400. Wide range so I'll be looking at upper 200 12 Leaps...
Happy Trading...
Targets prices range from 300-400. Wide range so I'll be looking at upper 200 12 Leaps...
Happy Trading...
American Eagle Outfitters (AEO)
Opened August 12.50 Calls today. AEO is near its 52-week low and was overly done on expectations by the analyst. Stock was trading over 19 before earnings and barely missed on certain numbers and analyst revised next quarters earnings. This brought AEO down below 13 where it doens't deserve to be.
Just check out what people are wearing today...
Happy Trading...
Just check out what people are wearing today...
Happy Trading...
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
Got a 100k, Put it here...
http://www.canslimpc.com/ CAN SLIM Private Client. Better than a mutual and based on the CAN SLIM analysis method, but it has a minimum of 100k investment! Check out their site, shows where they were inveseted to include cash at the right time!
C = Current quarterly earnings per share.
They should be up a minimum of 25% - 50% over the year earlier. In fact, of the 500 best performing stocks O'Neil studied in the 38 years from 1953 to 1990, three out of four had earnings increases averaging more than 70% in the latest publicly reported quarter before the stocks began their major price advance. The one out of four that didn't show solid quarterly increases did so in the very next quarter, and those increases averaged 90%!
C - A - N - S - L - I - M
A = Annual earnings per share.
There should be meaningful growth over the last five years. The annual compounded growth rate of earnings in the superior firms should be from 25% to 50%, or even more, per year. With all of this emphasis on earnings, it is important to understand something about Price-Earnings Ratios (P/E). Factual analysis of the greatest winning stocks shows that P/E ratios have very little to do with whether a stock should be bought or not! In fact, you will automatically eliminate most of the best investments available if you're not willing to by a stock that trades with a high P/E. Remember earlier when I mentioned Xerox? In 1960 it traded at a 100 P/E - before it went up 3300% from $5 to $170 (adjusting for the stock splits). Genentech was priced at 200 times earnings in November 1985, and it bolted 300% in the next 5 months. Syntex sold for 45 times earnings in 1963, before it advanced 400%. For years analysts have misused P/E ratios, and it's amazing to me how so many people will still ask about a company's P/E before they ask about a company's earnings growth.
C - A - N - S - L - I - M
N = New product/management/price high.
Usually it is a new product or service that causes the big earnings acceleration we're looking for. Consider these examples:
• Rexall's new Tupperware division, in 1958, helped the stock go from $16 to $50.
• Thiokol came out with new rocket fuels for missiles back in 1957-1959. The stock blasted from $48 to the equivalent of $355.
• In 1957-1960, Polaroid came out with the "picture in a minute" self-developing camera, the stock went from $65 to $260. Then in 1965-1967 they came out with a color-film version. The stock repeated with an amazing, split adjusted, rise from $23 to $133.
• Syntex, in 1963, began marketing the oral contraceptive pill. In six months the stock soared from $100 to $550.
• Computervision stock advanced 1235% in 1978-1980, with the introduction of Cad-Cam factory automation equipment.
• Price Company went up 15 fold in 1982-1986 while opening their chain of wholesale warehouse membership stores.
Get the point? 95% of the greatest winners in the 38 year study O'Neil conducted were companies that had a major new product or service.
The other important thing to consider is the price of the stock. Most people miss the biggest winners in the market because of what O'Neil refers to as "the great paradox" of the stock market. It is hard to accept, but the stocks that seem too high and risky to the majority usually go higher and what seems low and cheap usually goes lower. If you don't think this is true, I challenge you to look in an old newspaper from a few months ago and observe a good number of stocks highlighted because they hit new highs and new lows. Then see where they are today. Most of the highs will be higher, and the lows will be even lower.
C - A - N - S - L - I - M
S = Supply/Demand: Small Cap + Volume
Supply and demand dictates the price of almost everything in your life. The law of supply and demand is more important than all the analyst opinions on Wall Street. The price of a stock with 400 million shares is hard to budge up because of the large supply of stock available. Yet, if a company has only 2 or 3 million shares outstanding, a reasonable amount of buying can push the price up rapidly because of the small available supply. If you are choosing between two stocks to buy, one with 60 million shares outstanding and one with 10 million shares, with all other factors equal, the smaller one will usually be the bigger mover. Stocks that have a large percentage owned by top management are generally better prospects. Again referencing O'Neil's 38 year study, more than 95% of the companies had less than 25 million shares outstanding when they had their greatest period of earnings improvement and stock price performance.
Foolish stock splits can hurt a stock's performance. Watch out for companies that split their stock 2 or 3 times in just a year or two. The splitting creates a larger supply and may make a company's stock performance more lethargic, like many "big cap" companies. Large holders who thinking of selling are often inclined to sell their 100,000 share positions before a 3-for-1 split would have them looking to sell 300,000. Smart short sellers (an infinitesimal group) pick on stocks beginning to falter after enormous price runups and splits, realizing that the potential number of shares for sale (particularly by funds) has dramatically been increased.
C - A - N - S - L - I - M
L = Leader
People often buy stocks they're comfortable and familiar with, like an old pair of shoes. Usually these are draggy, slow-pokes rather than leaping leaders. It is really important to look at how your stock is performing in relation to the overall market. The 500 best performing stocks from 1953 to 1990 averaged a relative price strength of 87 (scale of 1-99) just before they began their major advances in price. Avoid laggard stocks and look for genuine leaders.
C - A - N - S - L - I - M
I = Institutional Sponsorship
It takes big demand to move a stock significantly higher in price. Institutional buyers are the most powerful source. You don't need a large number of institutional owners, but should have at least a few. No institutional sponsorship in a stock is a bad sign because odds are that many institutional investors looked at the stock and passed it over. The things we are looking for with C-A-N-S-L-I-M are really signs that the bigger money (mutual funds, banks, insurance companies, pension funds, etc.) is coming into the stock. See that there is a better-than-average performance record by at least a few of the institutional owners.
Another good thing about some institutional sponsorship is that it provides buying support for the stock. Beware of stocks that become "over owned". By the time performance is so obvious that almost all institutions own it, it is probably too late. Pay attention to whether the number of institutional owners is increasing or decreasing.
C - A - N - S - L - I - M
M = Market Direction
You can be right on everything else, but if you are wrong about the direction of the broad market you are still likely to lose money. The best way to analyze the overall market is to follow and understand every day what the general averages are doing. The difficult to recognize, but meaningful changes in the behavior of the market averages at important turning points is the best indicator of the condition of the whole market.
What signs should you look for to detect a market top? On one of the days in the uptrend, the total volume for the market will increase over the preceding day's high volume, but the Dow's closing average will show stalling action, or substantially less upward movement, than on prior days.
The spread between the daily high and low of the market index will likely be a bit larger than on the earlier days. Normal market liquidation near the market peak will only occur on one or two days, which are part of the uptrend. The market comes under distribution while it is advancing! This is one of the reasons so few people know how to recognize distribution (selling).
Immediately following the first selling near the top, a vacuum exists where volume may subside and the market averages will sell off for four days or so. The second, and probably the last early chance to recognize a top reversal is when the market attempts it's first rally, which it will always do after a number of days down from it's highest point. If this first attempt to bounce back follows through on the third, fourth, or fifth rally day either on decreased volume from the day before, or if the market average recovers less than half of the initial drop from it's former peak to the low, the comeback is feeble and sputtering when it should be getting strong. Frequently the first attempt at a rally during the beginning of a downtrend will fail abruptly. Possibly after a one day resurgence, the second day will open up strong, only to sell off toward the end of the day and suddenly close down.
After an advance in stocks for a couple of years, the majority of the original price leaders will top, and you can be fairly sure the overall market is going to get into trouble. It is very important to pay attention to the way the leading stocks are acting.
C - A - N - S - L - I - M
C = Current quarterly earnings per share.
They should be up a minimum of 25% - 50% over the year earlier. In fact, of the 500 best performing stocks O'Neil studied in the 38 years from 1953 to 1990, three out of four had earnings increases averaging more than 70% in the latest publicly reported quarter before the stocks began their major price advance. The one out of four that didn't show solid quarterly increases did so in the very next quarter, and those increases averaged 90%!
C - A - N - S - L - I - M
A = Annual earnings per share.
There should be meaningful growth over the last five years. The annual compounded growth rate of earnings in the superior firms should be from 25% to 50%, or even more, per year. With all of this emphasis on earnings, it is important to understand something about Price-Earnings Ratios (P/E). Factual analysis of the greatest winning stocks shows that P/E ratios have very little to do with whether a stock should be bought or not! In fact, you will automatically eliminate most of the best investments available if you're not willing to by a stock that trades with a high P/E. Remember earlier when I mentioned Xerox? In 1960 it traded at a 100 P/E - before it went up 3300% from $5 to $170 (adjusting for the stock splits). Genentech was priced at 200 times earnings in November 1985, and it bolted 300% in the next 5 months. Syntex sold for 45 times earnings in 1963, before it advanced 400%. For years analysts have misused P/E ratios, and it's amazing to me how so many people will still ask about a company's P/E before they ask about a company's earnings growth.
C - A - N - S - L - I - M
N = New product/management/price high.
Usually it is a new product or service that causes the big earnings acceleration we're looking for. Consider these examples:
• Rexall's new Tupperware division, in 1958, helped the stock go from $16 to $50.
• Thiokol came out with new rocket fuels for missiles back in 1957-1959. The stock blasted from $48 to the equivalent of $355.
• In 1957-1960, Polaroid came out with the "picture in a minute" self-developing camera, the stock went from $65 to $260. Then in 1965-1967 they came out with a color-film version. The stock repeated with an amazing, split adjusted, rise from $23 to $133.
• Syntex, in 1963, began marketing the oral contraceptive pill. In six months the stock soared from $100 to $550.
• Computervision stock advanced 1235% in 1978-1980, with the introduction of Cad-Cam factory automation equipment.
• Price Company went up 15 fold in 1982-1986 while opening their chain of wholesale warehouse membership stores.
Get the point? 95% of the greatest winners in the 38 year study O'Neil conducted were companies that had a major new product or service.
The other important thing to consider is the price of the stock. Most people miss the biggest winners in the market because of what O'Neil refers to as "the great paradox" of the stock market. It is hard to accept, but the stocks that seem too high and risky to the majority usually go higher and what seems low and cheap usually goes lower. If you don't think this is true, I challenge you to look in an old newspaper from a few months ago and observe a good number of stocks highlighted because they hit new highs and new lows. Then see where they are today. Most of the highs will be higher, and the lows will be even lower.
C - A - N - S - L - I - M
S = Supply/Demand: Small Cap + Volume
Supply and demand dictates the price of almost everything in your life. The law of supply and demand is more important than all the analyst opinions on Wall Street. The price of a stock with 400 million shares is hard to budge up because of the large supply of stock available. Yet, if a company has only 2 or 3 million shares outstanding, a reasonable amount of buying can push the price up rapidly because of the small available supply. If you are choosing between two stocks to buy, one with 60 million shares outstanding and one with 10 million shares, with all other factors equal, the smaller one will usually be the bigger mover. Stocks that have a large percentage owned by top management are generally better prospects. Again referencing O'Neil's 38 year study, more than 95% of the companies had less than 25 million shares outstanding when they had their greatest period of earnings improvement and stock price performance.
Foolish stock splits can hurt a stock's performance. Watch out for companies that split their stock 2 or 3 times in just a year or two. The splitting creates a larger supply and may make a company's stock performance more lethargic, like many "big cap" companies. Large holders who thinking of selling are often inclined to sell their 100,000 share positions before a 3-for-1 split would have them looking to sell 300,000. Smart short sellers (an infinitesimal group) pick on stocks beginning to falter after enormous price runups and splits, realizing that the potential number of shares for sale (particularly by funds) has dramatically been increased.
C - A - N - S - L - I - M
L = Leader
People often buy stocks they're comfortable and familiar with, like an old pair of shoes. Usually these are draggy, slow-pokes rather than leaping leaders. It is really important to look at how your stock is performing in relation to the overall market. The 500 best performing stocks from 1953 to 1990 averaged a relative price strength of 87 (scale of 1-99) just before they began their major advances in price. Avoid laggard stocks and look for genuine leaders.
C - A - N - S - L - I - M
I = Institutional Sponsorship
It takes big demand to move a stock significantly higher in price. Institutional buyers are the most powerful source. You don't need a large number of institutional owners, but should have at least a few. No institutional sponsorship in a stock is a bad sign because odds are that many institutional investors looked at the stock and passed it over. The things we are looking for with C-A-N-S-L-I-M are really signs that the bigger money (mutual funds, banks, insurance companies, pension funds, etc.) is coming into the stock. See that there is a better-than-average performance record by at least a few of the institutional owners.
Another good thing about some institutional sponsorship is that it provides buying support for the stock. Beware of stocks that become "over owned". By the time performance is so obvious that almost all institutions own it, it is probably too late. Pay attention to whether the number of institutional owners is increasing or decreasing.
C - A - N - S - L - I - M
M = Market Direction
You can be right on everything else, but if you are wrong about the direction of the broad market you are still likely to lose money. The best way to analyze the overall market is to follow and understand every day what the general averages are doing. The difficult to recognize, but meaningful changes in the behavior of the market averages at important turning points is the best indicator of the condition of the whole market.
What signs should you look for to detect a market top? On one of the days in the uptrend, the total volume for the market will increase over the preceding day's high volume, but the Dow's closing average will show stalling action, or substantially less upward movement, than on prior days.
The spread between the daily high and low of the market index will likely be a bit larger than on the earlier days. Normal market liquidation near the market peak will only occur on one or two days, which are part of the uptrend. The market comes under distribution while it is advancing! This is one of the reasons so few people know how to recognize distribution (selling).
Immediately following the first selling near the top, a vacuum exists where volume may subside and the market averages will sell off for four days or so. The second, and probably the last early chance to recognize a top reversal is when the market attempts it's first rally, which it will always do after a number of days down from it's highest point. If this first attempt to bounce back follows through on the third, fourth, or fifth rally day either on decreased volume from the day before, or if the market average recovers less than half of the initial drop from it's former peak to the low, the comeback is feeble and sputtering when it should be getting strong. Frequently the first attempt at a rally during the beginning of a downtrend will fail abruptly. Possibly after a one day resurgence, the second day will open up strong, only to sell off toward the end of the day and suddenly close down.
After an advance in stocks for a couple of years, the majority of the original price leaders will top, and you can be fairly sure the overall market is going to get into trouble. It is very important to pay attention to the way the leading stocks are acting.
C - A - N - S - L - I - M
APPLE Trend Success
So I pulled the trigger based on the trend I have been observing over the past month of trading AAPL. Bought another 10 Jul 260 Calls below 9 around 1 pm and things recoverd making a quick 12%. Although I am keeping them with a target of 18 to sell. Glad I did, AAPL is up on a million shares in the afterhours market and futures are currently pointing higher for tomorrow.
Upgrades came in all week. Recommend buying the 2011 LEAPS 260-280 area soon.
Happy Trading...
Upgrades came in all week. Recommend buying the 2011 LEAPS 260-280 area soon.
Happy Trading...
Monday, May 24, 2010
Quick Update
Sorry, been out for a while... AAPL is still showing/proving a strong daily trend. Buying 260 July Calls Friday yielded 50% returns today. Lot's of upgrades coming in. Still looking at the 260-280 CALL Jan 11 LEAPS. Holding 10 contracts of July 260's...
Picked up 500k shares of Cord Blood America today. Recent pullbacks warrant adding more to this speculative play. The acquisition in Germany and the 2011 Chinese Company opening coupled with no additional dilution of shares makes this a strong speculative play. Expect a ris to at least .01
Citi has been upgraded based on its recent pummeling, time to pick up some 2011/2012 leaps.
ITMN could be a steal, but we'll wait on the FDA final word first.
Looking at HCN Health Care REIT ETF, good dividend and diverse across healthcare real estate.
Happy Trading...
Picked up 500k shares of Cord Blood America today. Recent pullbacks warrant adding more to this speculative play. The acquisition in Germany and the 2011 Chinese Company opening coupled with no additional dilution of shares makes this a strong speculative play. Expect a ris to at least .01
Citi has been upgraded based on its recent pummeling, time to pick up some 2011/2012 leaps.
ITMN could be a steal, but we'll wait on the FDA final word first.
Looking at HCN Health Care REIT ETF, good dividend and diverse across healthcare real estate.
Happy Trading...
Friday, May 7, 2010
Covered Call Alert AFFYMAX (AFFY)
This week has provided some great buying ops. AFFY is highly rated, just announced 1st quarter earnings, narrowed losses and met milestones. Trading around 22 with great 22.50 premiums in the front-months. I am going in with the Oct 22.50 for 7.40+.
Happy Trading...
Happy Trading...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)